Wholesale

Friday, August 15, 2008

University of Missouri dean of medicine leaving for Arizona - Bizjournals.com


KOMU-TV

University of Missouri dean of medicine leaving for Arizona
Bizjournals.com - 6 hours ago
The dean of medicine at the University of Missouri has accepted a position as vice president for health affairs at the University of Arizona, the university said Thursday.
Med school dean explains his departure Columbia Daily Tribune
Top Health Post at UA Could Go coenzyme q10 Mo. Finalist RedOrbit
AZ Central.com - Columbia Missourian - Arizona Daily Star - Arizona Republic
all 21 news articles


If you are interested purchase dmae the question, which is better: fish oil supplements vs fish, this article will help answer that question. But the word better is a bit subjective. If, like us, you love sushi, or a fresh fish baked with herbs sprinkled all over it, then you are still going to want to enjoy eating fish.

However, if you're judging things based on which is better for your health: fish oil supplements vs fish, then the answer is clearly supplements--as long as you're picking the right kind of supplements. We'll discuss the answers to both of these, why supplements are better and how to choose a quality product.

First, the problem with eating fish is that whether you like it or not, virtually all of the Ocean waters harbor varying levels of pollutants.

And unfortunately, it's the healthiest type of fish--the species that are the fattiest--that can accumulate these toxins in their flesh most readily.

This is why the FDA recommends eating a limited serving of fish if you happen to be a pregnant or nursing woman. These toxins will especially be harmful to a fetus or growing baby nursing. In adults, they may take longer to wreak their havoc... but unfortunately they will.

The reality is simply that fatty fish--once the world's healthiest foods before mankind created a great deal of pollution--now has significant downsides.

However, technology and progress is a two edged sword. Through a process called molecular distillation, the toxins in fatty fish can be separated based on weight from the oils. This leaves only the beneficial oils which can then be encapsulated into supplements.

So, as long as you are taking a molecularly distilled product, there is no competition between the greater health benefits of fish oil supplements vs fish itself.

Also, with fish oil supplements, you can choose a product which is made out of a species that is particularly high in omega-3 content, such as hoki, which is a New Zealand fish known for its rich omega-3 value. After all, you're not eating it, and don't taste it. You're just swallowing a softgel or two a day.

However, when you eat fish, not all species are not equally high in omega-3 fats. In fact, many types of the most popular eating fishes barely have any omega 3 health benefits. For example, tilapia is a type of fish being sold in many trendy restaurants. Tilapia is a flaky white fish, not an oily fatty fish. Tilapia has almost no omega 3 fatty acids.

You may think salmon is a good choice, but most of the salmon being sold in supermarkets and purchase lcarnitine nowadays is farm raised. These salmon are fed pellets and do not consume their natural diet. It's their natural prey in their diet that makes salmon in the wild have such high omega 3 content.

In fact, farm raised salmon have to be injected with dye to give them the appearance of being pink! Only natural, wild salmon is pink. Who wants to eat dye injected pink salmon to give it the illusion of health?

In the end, choose wisely and you'll see that when it comes to fish oil supplements vs fish, there really is no choice at all.

Dan Ho is chief editor of http://www.omega-3-fish-oil-guide.com - Visit us now to learn more about the omega-3 fish oil supplement we personally use daily and why we chose this product after extensive research.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home